Robust Multicriteria Sustainability Assessmentin Urban Transportation

dc.contributor.author Gulcimen, Sedat
dc.contributor.author Aydogan, Emel Kizilkaya
dc.contributor.author Uzal, Nigmet
dc.contributor.authorID 0000-0002-8967-3484 en_US
dc.contributor.authorID 0000-0002-0912-3459 en_US
dc.contributor.department AGÜ, Mühendislik Fakültesi, İnşaat Mühendisliği Bölümü en_US
dc.contributor.institutionauthor Gulcimen, Sedat
dc.contributor.institutionauthor Uzal, Nigmet
dc.date.accessioned 2023-05-26T08:27:22Z
dc.date.available 2023-05-26T08:27:22Z
dc.date.issued 2023 en_US
dc.description.abstract Developing methodologies to facilitate the planning of sustainable transport systems for decision makers (DMs) is becoming more critical. This study proposed a methodological framework for sustainable urban transportation to make decisions during urban transportation's design and planning stages. Urban transportation alternatives were evaluated by sustainability indicators that considered a triple bottom line approach's environmental, economic, and social aspects. To choose the best alternative sustainable transportation scenarios, two multicriteria decision-making (MCDM) methods, for example, a hesitant fuzzy analytical hierarchy process (HF-AHP) and multiple attribute utility model (MAUT), were integrated. First, eight sustainable transportation indicators that considered data availability from the transport sector were selected. The weights of the selected indicators were calculated using an HF-AHP. These indicators included carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions, energy consumption, depletion of nonrenewable resources, operational and maintenance costs, fuel and taxes, the number of fatalities or injuries, and motor vehicles for public transport per 10,000 population. Finally, sensitivity analysis was applied to validate the robustness. Based on HF-AHP results, the number of fatalities or injuries was the most significant among the eight indicators, with a 0.158 normalized weight (N-i). The results of this integrated methodology highlighted that Alternative 11, which was dominated by low-motorized vehicles (low-MVs), was the best sustainable alternative and Alternative 1 was the worst sustainable alternative, which was dominated by high-MVs with 0.69 and 0.27 total utility values, respectively. Low-motorized urban transportation alternatives showed higher sustainable performances than the motorized and high-motorized alternatives. This study proposed a novel and robust methodology for decisions on sustainable urban transportation projects and renovating current urban transportation systems. en_US
dc.identifier.issn 0733-9488
dc.identifier.issn 1943-5444
dc.identifier.issue 2 en_US
dc.identifier.other WOS:000971222800002
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.1061/JUPDDM.UPENG-4090
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12573/1602
dc.identifier.volume 149 en_US
dc.language.iso eng en_US
dc.publisher ASCE-AMER SOC CIVIL ENGINEERS en_US
dc.relation.isversionof 10.1061/JUPDDM.UPENG-4090 en_US
dc.relation.journal JOURNAL OF URBAN PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategory Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı en_US
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess en_US
dc.subject Hesitant fuzzy analytical hierarchy process en_US
dc.subject Multiple attribute utility models en_US
dc.subject Multicriteria decision making en_US
dc.subject Sustainabletransportation en_US
dc.title Robust Multicriteria Sustainability Assessmentin Urban Transportation en_US
dc.type article en_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
JUPDDM.UPENG-4090.pdf
Size:
453.29 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Makale Dosyası

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.44 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: