Building composite indicators for the territorial quality of life assessment in European regions: combining data reduction and alternative weighting techniques

dc.contributor.author Ustaoglu, Eda
dc.contributor.author Lopez, Gloria Ortega
dc.contributor.author Gutierrez-Alcoba, Alejandro
dc.contributor.authorID 0000-0001-6874-5162 en_US
dc.contributor.department AGÜ, Yönetim Bilimleri Fakültesi, Ekonomi Bölümü en_US
dc.contributor.institutionauthor Ustaoglu, Eda
dc.date.accessioned 2024-04-15T12:26:21Z
dc.date.available 2024-04-15T12:26:21Z
dc.date.issued 2023 en_US
dc.description.abstract Development of composite indicators is a challenging task given that sustainability indices are strongly dependent on how the sub-indicators are weighted. This is because relative indicator weights may signifcantly difer based on the chosen weighting methods used in the analysis. There is hardly any study that has paid attention to this issue so far. Therefore, this paper aims to fll this gap in the literature by searching the robustness of selected weighting methods, i.e. entropy-weight (EW), principal component analysis (PCA), machine learning approaches (random forest-RF), regression analysis (RA) and beneft-ofthe-doubt (BOD) when constructing a composite indicator. To research the current sustainability performance of European regions, the present study focuses on the Territorial Quality of Life Index—initially proposed by the ESPON Programme—that are aligned with the specifc targets of the Sustainable Development Goals of the 2030 Agenda. The methods to construct composite indicators include stages of data preparation (including the estimation of missing values with random forest method), normalization, statistical transformation of raw data, reduction of indicators in order to ease public communication (using the PCA method) and data interpretation, weighting of the sub-indicators using EW, PCA, RF, RA and BOD methods and their linear weighted aggregation, and checking for robustness and sensitivity. The results suggest that there are signifcant diferences in the rank and spatial distribution of composite indicators based on the use of diferent weighting methods considered in the analysis. The results from sensitivity analysis support the robustness of entropy-weight method among others. The methodology used in the current analysis can be adapted to other study areas and regions internationally. The fndings showed that Eastern European countries and some Mediterranean countries have relatively lower index values compared to other European regions; therefore, policy and planning actions are needed covering these regions specifcally. en_US
dc.identifier.endpage 39 en_US
dc.identifier.issn 1387-585X
dc.identifier.startpage 1 en_US
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-04116-w
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12573/2085
dc.language.iso eng en_US
dc.publisher SPRINGER en_US
dc.relation.isversionof 10.1007/s10668-023-04116-w en_US
dc.relation.journal Environment, Development and Sustainability en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategory Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı en_US
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess en_US
dc.subject Sustainable urbanization en_US
dc.subject Territorial quality of life en_US
dc.subject Composite indicators en_US
dc.subject Weighting procedures en_US
dc.subject Europe en_US
dc.title Building composite indicators for the territorial quality of life assessment in European regions: combining data reduction and alternative weighting techniques en_US
dc.type article en_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
s10668-023-04116-w.pdf
Size:
3.22 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Makale Dosyası

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.44 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: