Review of Feature Selection Approaches Based on Grouping of Features
Loading...
Date
2023
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
PeerJ Inc
Open Access Color
GOLD
Green Open Access
Yes
OpenAIRE Downloads
20
OpenAIRE Views
59
Publicly Funded
No
Abstract
With the rapid development in technology, large amounts of high-dimensional data have been generated. This high dimensionality including redundancy and irrelevancy poses a great challenge in data analysis and decision making. Feature selection (FS) is an effective way to reduce dimensionality by eliminating redundant and irrelevant data. Most traditional FS approaches score and rank each feature individually; and then perform FS either by eliminating lower ranked features or by retaining highly -ranked features. In this review, we discuss an emerging approach to FS that is based on initially grouping features, then scoring groups of features rather than scoring individual features. Despite the presence of reviews on clustering and FS algorithms, to the best of our knowledge, this is the first review focusing on FS techniques based on grouping. The typical idea behind FS through grouping is to generate groups of similar features with dissimilarity between groups, then select representative features from each cluster. Approaches under supervised, unsupervised, semi supervised and integrative frameworks are explored. The comparison of experimental results indicates the effectiveness of sequential, optimization-based (i.e., fuzzy or evolutionary), hybrid and multi-method approaches. When it comes to biological data, the involvement of external biological sources can improve analysis results. We hope this work's findings can guide effective design of new FS approaches using feature grouping.
Description
Keywords
Feature Selection, Feature Grouping, Supervised, Unsupervised, Integrative, QH301-705.5, Bioinformatics, Feature selection, Feature grouping, Integrative, R, Medicine, Biology (General), Supervised, Algorithms, Unsupervised
Fields of Science
Citation
WoS Q
Q2
Scopus Q
Q3

OpenCitations Citation Count
44
Source
PeerJ
Volume
11
Issue
Start Page
e15666
End Page
PlumX Metrics
Citations
Scopus : 58
PubMed : 5
Captures
Mendeley Readers : 77
SCOPUS™ Citations
58
checked on Apr 14, 2026
Web of Science™ Citations
44
checked on Apr 14, 2026
Page Views
5
checked on Apr 14, 2026
Downloads
4
checked on Apr 14, 2026
Google Scholar™


