Comparative Assessment of Smooth and Non-Smooth Optimization Solvers in Hanso Software
No Thumbnail Available
Date
2022
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Ramazan Yaman
Open Access Color
GOLD
Green Open Access
Yes
OpenAIRE Downloads
97
OpenAIRE Views
182
Publicly Funded
No
Abstract
The aim of this study is to compare the performance of smooth and nonsmooth mization) software. The smooth optimization solver is the implementation of the Broyden-Fletcher-Goldfarb-Shanno (BFGS) method and the nonsmooth optimization solver is the Hybrid Algorithm for Nonsmooth Optimization. More precisely, the nonsmooth optimization algorithm is the combination of the BFGS and the Gradient Sampling Algorithm (GSA). We use well-known collection of academic test problems for nonsmooth optimization containing both convex and nonconvex problems. The motivation for this research is the importance of the comparative assessment of smooth optimization methods for solving nonsmooth optimization problems. This assessment will demonstrate how successful is the BFGS method for solving nonsmooth optimization problems in comparison with the nonsmooth optimization solver from HANSO. Performance profiles using the number iterations, the number of function evaluations and the number of subgradient evaluations are used to compare solvers.
Description
Tor, Ali Hakan/0000-0003-3193-5004
ORCID
Keywords
Non-Smooth Optimization Software, Bfgs, Gradient Sampling Algorithm, Hybrid Algorithm, Non-smooth optimization software, Hybrid algorithm, BFGS, Gradient sampling algorithm
Turkish CoHE Thesis Center URL
Fields of Science
0211 other engineering and technologies, 02 engineering and technology
Citation
WoS Q
Q1
Scopus Q
Q2

OpenCitations Citation Count
N/A
Source
International Journal of Optimization and Control - Theories & Applications – IJOCTA
Volume
12
Issue
1
Start Page
39
End Page
46
PlumX Metrics
Citations
Scopus : 0
Google Scholar™

OpenAlex FWCI
0.0
Sustainable Development Goals
11
SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND COMMUNITIES

12
RESPONSIBLE CONSUMPTION AND PRODUCTION

13
CLIMATE ACTION

17
PARTNERSHIPS FOR THE GOALS


