Topuz, Ömer

Loading...
Profile Picture
Name Variants
Topuz, Ömer
Job Title
Arş. Gör.
Email Address
omer.topuz@agu.edu.tr
Main Affiliation
06.02. Psikoloji
Status
Current Staff
Website
Scopus Author ID
Turkish CoHE Profile ID
Google Scholar ID
WoS Researcher ID

Sustainable Development Goals

5

GENDER EQUALITY
GENDER EQUALITY Logo

1

Research Products

10

REDUCED INEQUALITIES
REDUCED INEQUALITIES Logo

1

Research Products

16

PEACE, JUSTICE AND STRONG INSTITUTIONS
PEACE, JUSTICE AND STRONG INSTITUTIONS Logo

1

Research Products
This researcher does not have a Scopus ID.
This researcher does not have a WoS ID.
Scholarly Output

1

Articles

1

Views / Downloads

2/0

Supervised MSc Theses

0

Supervised PhD Theses

0

WoS Citation Count

0

Scopus Citation Count

1

WoS h-index

0

Scopus h-index

1

Patents

0

Projects

0

WoS Citations per Publication

0.00

Scopus Citations per Publication

1.00

Open Access Source

0

Supervised Theses

0

Google Analytics Visitor Traffic

JournalCount
Peace and Conflict-Journal of Peace Psychology1
Current Page: 1 / 1

Scopus Quartile Distribution

Competency Cloud

GCRIS Competency Cloud

Scholarly Output Search Results

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
  • Article
    Citation - Scopus: 1
    Why Is the Lack of Support for Women's Rights Appealing? Considering the Roles of Dispositional System-Justifying Motives and Ambivalent Sexism
    (American Psychological Association, 2024) Özdemir, Fatih; Tayyar, Merve; Topuz, Ömer
    Although the women's rights movement has made various gains in recent years, there are many negative attitudes toward women and their rights in Turkey. This study aimed to examine the relationship between dispositional system-justifying motives and tendency to support women's rights and to test the mediating role of sexist attitudes in this relationship. A total of 530 Turkish adults participated in the online study, with a mean age of 26.20 years (SD = 5.56). The results show that people with high system justification motivation (including dispositional system-justifying motives, high death anxiety, low need for cognition, and high need for recognition) indicated stronger ambivalent sexism toward women (including hostile and benevolent sexist attitudes). In turn, people with ambivalent sexist attitudes had less willingness to support women's rights (considering attitudes toward women's disadvantaged position in society and awareness and support for the Istanbul Convention). © 2025 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.