Why Is the Lack of Support for Women's Rights Appealing? Considering the Roles of Dispositional System-Justifying Motives and Ambivalent Sexism
Loading...

Date
2024
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
American Psychological Association
Open Access Color
Green Open Access
No
OpenAIRE Downloads
OpenAIRE Views
Publicly Funded
No
Abstract
Although the women's rights movement has made various gains in recent years, there are many negative attitudes toward women and their rights in Turkey. This study aimed to examine the relationship between dispositional system-justifying motives and tendency to support women's rights and to test the mediating role of sexist attitudes in this relationship. A total of 530 Turkish adults participated in the online study, with a mean age of 26.20 years (SD = 5.56). The results show that people with high system justification motivation (including dispositional system-justifying motives, high death anxiety, low need for cognition, and high need for recognition) indicated stronger ambivalent sexism toward women (including hostile and benevolent sexist attitudes). In turn, people with ambivalent sexist attitudes had less willingness to support women's rights (considering attitudes toward women's disadvantaged position in society and awareness and support for the Istanbul Convention). © 2025 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
Description
Keywords
Ambivalent Sexism, Dispositional System-Justifying Motives, The Istanbul Convention, Women's Rights, Adult, Cognition, Gender Discrimination, Human Rights, Womens Status, Istanbul [Turkey], Turkey
Fields of Science
Citation
WoS Q
Q4
Scopus Q
Q2

OpenCitations Citation Count
1
Source
Peace and Conflict-Journal of Peace Psychology
Volume
30
Issue
4
Start Page
507
End Page
517
Collections
PlumX Metrics
Citations
Scopus : 1
Captures
Mendeley Readers : 11
Google Scholar™


