Network cost allocation methods for pay-as-bid peer-to-peer energy trading: A comparison

dc.contributor.author Noorfatima N.
dc.contributor.author Choi, Yunjeong
dc.contributor.author Onen, Ahmet
dc.contributor.author Jung, Jaesung
dc.contributor.authorID 0000-0001-7086-5112 en_US
dc.contributor.department AGÜ, Mühendislik Fakültesi, Elektrik - Elektronik Mühendisliği Bölümü en_US
dc.contributor.institutionauthor Onen, Ahmet
dc.date.accessioned 2024-05-16T06:40:15Z
dc.date.available 2024-05-16T06:40:15Z
dc.date.issued 2022 en_US
dc.description.abstract In pay-as-bid peer-to-peer (P2P) energy trading, various types of prosumers and consumers can participate, regardless of their offers. Thus, various types of participants impact the network differently. However, very few pay-as-bid P2P energy trading studies have specifically discussed appropriate compensation for network usage, although the market is implemented in existing utility-owned grids. Therefore, to improve the performance of pay-as-bid P2P energy trading, it is important to determine the appropriate compensation to utilities for network usage. This study aims to obtain an appropriate network cost allocation method for pay-as-bid P2P energy trading. Hence, the authors present a review of pay-as-bid P2P market mechanisms and various network cost allocation (NCA) methods. Additionally, a comprehensive evaluation framework is proposed to determine the most appropriate NCA method for the pay-as-bid P2P energy trading system. A comparison was made between various NCA methods to investigate the outcomes of the implementation of different NCA methods to various market conditions. The study constructs a case study based on the operator-oriented P2P model to represent the pay-as-bid P2P energy trading system. The simulation of pay-as-bid P2P energy trading with large participant number is applied in the IEEE 69-bus distribution system. The study concluded that applying the appropriate NCA method would improve the performance of pay-as-bid P2P energy trading operation. en_US
dc.description.sponsorship This work was supported by the Korea Institute of Energy Technology Evaluation and Planning (KETEP) and the Ministry of Trade, Industry & Energy (MOTIE) of the Republic of Korea (No. 20191210301820). This work was also supported by ‘‘Human Resources Program in Energy Technology’’ of the Korea Institute of Energy Technology Evaluation and Planning (KETEP), granted financial resource from the Ministry of Trade, Industry & Energy, Republic of Korea (No. 20194030202370). en_US
dc.identifier.endpage 14463 en_US
dc.identifier.issn 2352-4847
dc.identifier.startpage 14442 en_US
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2022.10.405
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12573/2123
dc.identifier.volume 8 en_US
dc.language.iso eng en_US
dc.publisher ELSEVIER en_US
dc.relation.isversionof 10.1016/j.egyr.2022.10.405 en_US
dc.relation.journal Energy Reports en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategory Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı en_US
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess en_US
dc.subject Peer-to-peer energy trading en_US
dc.subject Pay-as-bid en_US
dc.subject Network cost allocation en_US
dc.subject Network usage cost en_US
dc.subject Evaluation framework en_US
dc.title Network cost allocation methods for pay-as-bid peer-to-peer energy trading: A comparison en_US
dc.type article en_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
1-s2.0-S235248472202340X-main.pdf
Size:
3.6 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Makale Dosyası

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.44 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: