Comparative Analysis of Hybrid Geothermal-Solar Systems and Solar PV With Battery Storage: Site Suitability, Emissions, and Economic Performance

dc.contributor.author Fedakar, Halil Ibrahim
dc.contributor.author Dincer, Ali Ersin
dc.contributor.author Demir, Abdullah
dc.date.accessioned 2025-09-25T10:42:54Z
dc.date.available 2025-09-25T10:42:54Z
dc.date.issued 2025
dc.description Dincer, Ali Ersin/0000-0002-4662-894X; en_US
dc.description.abstract Renewable energy integration has become a critical focus in the global effort to reduce carbon emissions and diversify energy sources. In regions with distinct geographic features, such as Turkiye, combining different renewable technologies can offer enhanced energy security. This study investigates the site suitability and economic and environmental performance of hybrid geothermal-solar systems and solar PV systems with battery storage across the provinces of Osmaniye, Hatay, and Kilis, of Turkiye. Using the fuzzy-AHP method, site suitability is evaluated, addressing a key gap in comparing these systems' adaptability to varying geographic conditions. This study is the first to directly compare these two renewable energy technologies in terms of site suitability. The findings reveal significant differences in site suitability, with solar PV systems with battery storage demonstrating broader applicability across the region. The suitable sites (20-100 % suitability) cover 1260.82 km(2) for solar PV systems with battery storage and only 122.18 km(2) for hybrid geothermal-solar systems. In terms of environmental impact, hybrid geothermal-solar systems exhibit significantly lower carbon emissions, averaging 44.6 kg CO2/MWh, compared to 123.8 kg CO2/MWh for solar PV systems with battery storage. Economically, hybrid geothermal-solar systems also outperform with a lower levelized cost of electricity of $0.091 kWh versus $0.254 kWh for solar PV systems. These results highlight the environmental and economic advantages of hybrid geothermal-solar systems, while also emphasizing their limited scalability to regions with geothermal activity. Conversely, solar PV systems, despite their higher emissions and costs, offer greater flexibility and potential for widespread deployment. en_US
dc.identifier.doi 10.1016/j.geothermics.2024.103175
dc.identifier.issn 0375-6505
dc.identifier.issn 1879-3576
dc.identifier.scopus 2-s2.0-85205149503
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geothermics.2024.103175
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12573/3484
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Pergamon-Elsevier Science Ltd en_US
dc.relation.ispartof Geothermics en_US
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess en_US
dc.subject Fuzzy-AHP en_US
dc.subject Sustainable Site Selection en_US
dc.subject Lcoe en_US
dc.subject Solar PV en_US
dc.subject Carbon Emissions en_US
dc.subject Hybrid Geothermal-Solar Energy en_US
dc.subject Clean Energy Technology en_US
dc.title Comparative Analysis of Hybrid Geothermal-Solar Systems and Solar PV With Battery Storage: Site Suitability, Emissions, and Economic Performance en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dspace.entity.type Publication
gdc.author.id Dincer, Ali Ersin/0000-0002-4662-894X
gdc.author.id Demir, Abdullah/0000-0002-6392-648X
gdc.author.scopusid 55946096500
gdc.author.scopusid 56825490100
gdc.author.scopusid 57208242277
gdc.author.wosid Fedakar, Halil/Aad-4987-2020
gdc.author.wosid Dinçer, Ersin/Gsi-8485-2022
gdc.author.wosid Demir, Abdullah/Ixx-2300-2023
gdc.bip.impulseclass C4
gdc.bip.influenceclass C4
gdc.bip.popularityclass C4
gdc.coar.access metadata only access
gdc.coar.type text::journal::journal article
gdc.collaboration.industrial false
gdc.description.department Abdullah Gül University en_US
gdc.description.departmenttemp [Fedakar, Halil Ibrahim] Transportat Lab Abdullah Gul Univ, Dept Civil Engn, TR-38080 Kayseri, Turkiye; [Dincer, Ali Ersin] Hydraul Lab Abdullah Gul Univ, Dept Civil Engn, TR-38080 Kayseri, Turkiye; [Demir, Abdullah] Abdullah Gul Univ, Dept Civil Engn, Struct Eng Lab, TR-38080 Kayseri, Turkiye en_US
gdc.description.publicationcategory Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı en_US
gdc.description.scopusquality Q2
gdc.description.volume 125 en_US
gdc.description.woscitationindex Science Citation Index Expanded
gdc.description.wosquality Q1
gdc.identifier.openalex W4402951871
gdc.identifier.wos WOS:001328784000001
gdc.index.type WoS
gdc.index.type Scopus
gdc.oaire.diamondjournal false
gdc.oaire.impulse 13.0
gdc.oaire.influence 3.4813366E-9
gdc.oaire.isgreen false
gdc.oaire.popularity 1.2001075E-8
gdc.oaire.publicfunded false
gdc.openalex.collaboration National
gdc.openalex.fwci 1.8415
gdc.openalex.normalizedpercentile 0.85
gdc.openalex.toppercent TOP 1%
gdc.opencitations.count 9
gdc.plumx.mendeley 40
gdc.plumx.scopuscites 14
gdc.scopus.citedcount 15
gdc.virtual.author Fedakar, Halil İbrahim
gdc.virtual.author Dinçer, Ali Ersin
gdc.virtual.author Demir, Abdullah
gdc.wos.citedcount 14
relation.isAuthorOfPublication add987df-c5ab-45ec-9de0-f3cc90807f79
relation.isAuthorOfPublication ad16161e-c6d3-4e13-959b-96a86c77a1a1
relation.isAuthorOfPublication 065b7f15-849f-4894-a929-c347acf68232
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery add987df-c5ab-45ec-9de0-f3cc90807f79
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication 665d3039-05f8-4a25-9a3c-b9550bffecef
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication 8391029c-c533-4c81-9dd0-34470a5aacb7
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication ef13a800-4c99-4124-81e0-3e25b33c0c2b
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery 665d3039-05f8-4a25-9a3c-b9550bffecef

Files