Why Are Faculty Unfavorably Disposed to MOOCs? – A Sharing of Views by Chinese Hospitality Educators

Loading...
Publication Logo

Date

2023

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Routledge Journals, Taylor & Francis Ltd

Open Access Color

Green Open Access

No

OpenAIRE Downloads

OpenAIRE Views

Publicly Funded

No
Impulse
Average
Influence
Average
Popularity
Average

Research Projects

Journal Issue

Abstract

This study explores the negative disposition of many hospitality higher education faculty toward MOOCs, an increasingly prominent delivery mode in pedagogical discourse which potentially enriches student learning. Such enrichment is particularly welcome in the case of hospitality because of its diverse stakeholders and student learning needs. The researchers conducted an in-depth and qualitative exploration with faculty members in mainland China. They combined the Diffusion of Innovation (DOI) approach and theory of motivation to propose five dimensions that account for groupings of resistance to deploying MOOCs. These are attributes and complexities, perceived incompatibility, unsuitability for trial, and lack of observational capacity. The study contributes to knowledge by examining the perspectives of faculty who have the capacity to constrain the deployment of MOOCs. The authors suggest that faculty members should be encouraged to embrace MOOCs as an innovative medium for learning and teaching.

Description

Koseoglu, Mehmet Ali/0000-0001-9369-1995; King, Brian Edward Melville/0000-0002-5300-5564; Aladag, Omer Faruk/0000-0002-5176-679X;

Keywords

Moocs, Hospitality Educators, Resistance to Innovation, Motivations, Diffusion of Innovation Theory, Faculty Members, Faculty members, Hospitality educators, MOOCs, Resistance to innovation, Motivations, Diffusion of innovation theory

Fields of Science

0502 economics and business, 05 social sciences, 0503 education

Citation

WoS Q

Q2

Scopus Q

Q2
OpenCitations Logo
OpenCitations Citation Count
1

Source

Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Education

Volume

35

Issue

2

Start Page

123

End Page

132
PlumX Metrics
Citations

CrossRef : 1

Scopus : 0

Captures

Mendeley Readers : 34

Google Scholar Logo
Google Scholar™
OpenAlex Logo
OpenAlex FWCI
0.6506

Sustainable Development Goals