Gender Equity, Internationalization, and the Quintuple Helix: Comparative NLP Analysis of University Strategies in Japan and Turkiye

dc.contributor.author Rogler, Andreas
dc.contributor.author Morozumi, Akiko
dc.contributor.author Coymak, Ahmet
dc.contributor.author Bengu, Elif
dc.date.accessioned 2026-03-23T14:49:39Z
dc.date.available 2026-03-23T14:49:39Z
dc.date.issued 2026-03-08
dc.description.abstract As higher education institutions (HEIs) seek to align with Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), integrating diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) into internationalization strategies has become increasingly central. In this study, we analyze 209 university strategic plans, 86 from Japan (2022-2027) and 123 from Turkiye (2019-2023), to examine how institutional discourse frames gender equity, with a particular focus on SDG 5, gender equality. We identify clear and distinct national patterns using natural language processing (NLP) techniques (e.g., keyword frequency analysis, named entity recognition, and syntactic parsing) and are guided by the quintuple helix model (QHM). Japanese universities tend to emphasize societal engagement and forward-looking commitments through abstract language. In contrast, Turkish universities adopt a more bureaucratic and retrospective tone, often referring explicitly to named target groups. We find that both countries show limited engagement with intersectional identities and marginalized populations such as female faculty, migrants, and refugees, and both underutilize the civil society and environmental dimensions of the QHM. Although inclusive values frequently appear, strategic plans rarely include clear details on how to reach these goals. Based on our analysis, we propose a scalable, reproducible framework for evaluating inclusive internationalization. Our findings underscore the importance of moving beyond symbolic discourse and calling for more accountable, stakeholder-driven planning processes that embed DEI into the structural, curricular, and governance systems of HEIs.
dc.description.sponsorship The authors used generative AI tools (e.g., Grammarly, ChatGPT) during drafting and language refinement. The study analyzed publicly available institutional strategy documents obtained from official university and government websites in Japan and Tuerkiye; therefore, the study was exempt from ethical approval under institutional IRB guidelines. No human data were used. The study complied with principles of transparency, data protection, and the FAIR framework. This research was supported by the Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkiye (TUBITAK) under the 2219 International Postdoctoral Research Fellowship Program, awarded to the first author.
dc.description.sponsorship Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkiye (TUBITAK) under the 2219 International Postdoctoral Research Fellowship Program
dc.description.sponsorship Türkiye’s Council of Higher Education; Scientific and Technological Research Council of Türkiye; TÜBİTAK; YÖK; Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, MEXT
dc.description.sponsorship Government: State agencies such as Japan’s Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT) and Türkiye’s Council of Higher Education (YÖK) define policy priorities, allocate funding, and establish accountability mechanisms. These can either support or hinder DEI through visa regulations, scholarship schemes, or program accreditation, which can expand or limit equitablecacess totirnenational education.
dc.identifier.doi 10.32674/je5apa51
dc.identifier.issn 2162-3104
dc.identifier.issn 2166-3750
dc.identifier.scopus 2-s2.0-105032902384
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12573/5839
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.32674/je5apa51
dc.language.iso en
dc.publisher Univ Louisiana Monroe
dc.relation.ispartof Journal of International Students
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subject Diversity
dc.subject Higher Education Institutions
dc.subject Comparative Higher Education
dc.subject Inclusive Internationalization
dc.subject Natural Language Processing
dc.subject Sdg 5
dc.subject Quintuple Helix Model
dc.subject Equity
dc.subject And Inclusion
dc.title Gender Equity, Internationalization, and the Quintuple Helix: Comparative NLP Analysis of University Strategies in Japan and Turkiye
dc.type Article
dspace.entity.type Publication
gdc.author.id Çoymak, Ahmet/0000-0003-1816-6212
gdc.author.id Morozumi, Akiko/0009-0006-0281-6646
gdc.author.id Rogler, Andreas/0009-0000-4525-5806
gdc.author.scopusid 57190576583
gdc.author.scopusid 56909878500
gdc.author.scopusid 60397384100
gdc.author.scopusid 37060456700
gdc.author.wosid bengu, elif/A-5021-2018
gdc.author.wosid Çoymak, Ahmet/W-1269-2019
gdc.coar.access open access
gdc.coar.type text::journal::journal article
gdc.collaboration.industrial false
gdc.description.department Abdullah Gül University
gdc.description.departmenttemp [Bengu, Elif; Morozumi, Akiko] Univ Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan; [Bengu, Elif; Coymak, Ahmet] Abdullah Gul Univ, Kayseri, Turkiye; [Rogler, Andreas] Univ Oulu, Oulu, Finland
gdc.description.endpage 180
gdc.description.issue 8
gdc.description.publicationcategory Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
gdc.description.startpage 153
gdc.description.volume 16
gdc.description.woscitationindex Emerging Sources Citation Index
gdc.identifier.openalex W7134284652
gdc.identifier.wos WOS:001711850800005
gdc.index.type WoS
gdc.index.type Scopus
gdc.openalex.collaboration International
gdc.openalex.fwci 0.00
gdc.openalex.normalizedpercentile 0.49
gdc.opencitations.count 0
gdc.plumx.scopuscites 0
gdc.scopus.citedcount 0
gdc.wos.citedcount 0
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery fc4e50f8-696b-423a-b6d9-ee15312c73ec
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery 0f8f363c-b921-4647-ad4e-acaf89064c65

Files