Unravelling the Moderating Roles of Environmental Regulations on the Impact of Foreign Direct Investment on Environmental Sustainability
Loading...
Date
2025
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Academic Press Ltd- Elsevier Science Ltd
Open Access Color
Green Open Access
No
OpenAIRE Downloads
OpenAIRE Views
Publicly Funded
No
Abstract
In the era of economic globalization, China attracts significant foreign direct investment (FDI) to accelerate economic prosperity. FDI inflows could have ramifications on environmental degradation (ED) despite the enactment of different environmental regulations (ERs) such as market-incentive, command-and-control as well as informal regulations. Though some studies have shown that FDI and ED have significant relationship, the moderating roles of different ERs on the environmental impact of FDI has not been empirically unraveled. This study fills this research gap by analyzing the direct impact of FDI on ED (i.e., carbon dioxide emissions, ecological footprint) using the provincial panel data. Second, it unravels the moderating roles of different ERs on the environmental impact of FDI in the provinces and regions. The results indicate that FDI directly mitigates ED, verifying the pollution halo hypothesis while ERs directly alleviate ED in China. However, the interaction between FDI and ERs do not alleviate ED in China albeit regional heterogeneity exist. The economic implication is that FDI is not a channel through which ERs enhance environmental sustainability in China. This study recommends some policy options arising from the findings.
Description
Keywords
Environmental Sustainability, Foreign Direct Investment, Environmental Regulations, China, Conservation of Natural Resources, Internationality, Economic Development, Investments, Carbon Dioxide, Environment, Environmental Policy, Environmental Pollution
Fields of Science
Citation
WoS Q
Q1
Scopus Q
Q1

OpenCitations Citation Count
6
Source
Journal of Environmental Management
Volume
375
Issue
Start Page
End Page
PlumX Metrics
Citations
CrossRef : 8
Scopus : 11
Captures
Mendeley Readers : 13
Google Scholar™


