A Survey of Dynamic Bandwidth Assignment Schemes for TDM-Based Passive Optical Network
Loading...
Date
2020
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
De Gruyter Open Ltd
Open Access Color
Green Open Access
No
OpenAIRE Downloads
OpenAIRE Views
Publicly Funded
No
Abstract
In time division, multiple access (TDMA)-based passive optical network (PONs), a dynamic bandwidth assignment (DBA) is necessary for efficient utilization of the available bandwidth of the upstream link. An efficient DBA scheme can improve the upstream performance of a traffic class of an ONU in two ways. First, it can increase the bandwidth assignment to it by efficiently utilizing the available bandwidth. Secondly, it can reduce the channel and frame idle time by increasing the polling frequency and by assigning extra surplus bandwidth not used by the other ONUs. Many DBA schemes have been reported for both ITU PONs (GPON and XGPON) and IEEE PONs (EPON and 10G EPON). In this study, we explain the impact of DBA scheme on the upstream performance of PON and then do a thorough survey of both PON standards, categorize the DBA schemes and review them critically. Based on the literature review we also give our opinion on the most suitable DBA scheme for both type PONs on the basis of upstream delays, frame loss and bandwidth utilization efficiency. © 2020 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
Description
Keywords
Dba, Dynamic Bandwidth Assignment, Epon, Pon, Xgpon, Bandwidth, Passive Networks, Surveys, Time Division Multiple Access, Available Bandwidth, Band-Width Utilization, Bandwidth Assignments, Dynamic Bandwidth Assignment, Epon, Literature Reviews, Surplus Bandwidth, Xgpon, Passive Optical Networks
Fields of Science
0202 electrical engineering, electronic engineering, information engineering, 02 engineering and technology
Citation
WoS Q
N/A
Scopus Q
Q1

OpenCitations Citation Count
18
Source
Journal of Optical Communications
Volume
41
Issue
3
Start Page
279
End Page
293
Collections
PlumX Metrics
Citations
CrossRef : 6
Scopus : 22
Captures
Mendeley Readers : 31
Google Scholar™


