Robust Multicriteria Sustainability Assessment in Urban Transportation

No Thumbnail Available

Date

2023

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

ASCE-Amer Soc Civil Engineers

Open Access Color

Green Open Access

No

OpenAIRE Downloads

OpenAIRE Views

Publicly Funded

No
Impulse
Average
Influence
Average
Popularity
Top 10%

Research Projects

Journal Issue

Abstract

Developing methodologies to facilitate the planning of sustainable transport systems for decision makers (DMs) is becoming more critical. This study proposed a methodological framework for sustainable urban transportation to make decisions during urban transportation's design and planning stages. Urban transportation alternatives were evaluated by sustainability indicators that considered a triple bottom line approach's environmental, economic, and social aspects. To choose the best alternative sustainable transportation scenarios, two multicriteria decision-making (MCDM) methods, for example, a hesitant fuzzy analytical hierarchy process (HF-AHP) and multiple attribute utility model (MAUT), were integrated. First, eight sustainable transportation indicators that considered data availability from the transport sector were selected. The weights of the selected indicators were calculated using an HF-AHP. These indicators included carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions, energy consumption, depletion of nonrenewable resources, operational and maintenance costs, fuel and taxes, the number of fatalities or injuries, and motor vehicles for public transport per 10,000 population. Finally, sensitivity analysis was applied to validate the robustness. Based on HF-AHP results, the number of fatalities or injuries was the most significant among the eight indicators, with a 0.158 normalized weight (N-i). The results of this integrated methodology highlighted that Alternative 11, which was dominated by low-motorized vehicles (low-MVs), was the best sustainable alternative and Alternative 1 was the worst sustainable alternative, which was dominated by high-MVs with 0.69 and 0.27 total utility values, respectively. Low-motorized urban transportation alternatives showed higher sustainable performances than the motorized and high-motorized alternatives. This study proposed a novel and robust methodology for decisions on sustainable urban transportation projects and renovating current urban transportation systems.

Description

Akkurt, Mehmet/0000-0003-2421-0929; Kizilkaya Aydogan, Emel/0000-0003-0927-6698

Keywords

Hesitant Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy Process, Multiple Attribute Utility Models, Multicriteria Decision Making, Sustainable Transportation

Turkish CoHE Thesis Center URL

Fields of Science

0502 economics and business, 05 social sciences, 0202 electrical engineering, electronic engineering, information engineering, 02 engineering and technology

Citation

WoS Q

Q2

Scopus Q

Q2
OpenCitations Logo
OpenCitations Citation Count
4

Source

Journal of Urban Planning and Development

Volume

149

Issue

2

Start Page

End Page

PlumX Metrics
Citations

Scopus : 5

Captures

Mendeley Readers : 28

SCOPUS™ Citations

5

checked on Feb 03, 2026

Web of Science™ Citations

4

checked on Feb 03, 2026

Page Views

5

checked on Feb 03, 2026

Google Scholar Logo
Google Scholar™
OpenAlex Logo
OpenAlex FWCI
2.2644233

Sustainable Development Goals

11

SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND COMMUNITIES
SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND COMMUNITIES Logo

12

RESPONSIBLE CONSUMPTION AND PRODUCTION
RESPONSIBLE CONSUMPTION AND PRODUCTION Logo

13

CLIMATE ACTION
CLIMATE ACTION Logo

17

PARTNERSHIPS FOR THE GOALS
PARTNERSHIPS FOR THE GOALS Logo