Equivalent Stress Block Parameters for Fly Ash-Based Geopolymer Concrete Structural Elements

dc.contributor.author Ozbayrak, Ahmet
dc.contributor.author Kucukgoncu, Hurmet
dc.date.accessioned 2025-09-25T10:46:32Z
dc.date.available 2025-09-25T10:46:32Z
dc.date.issued 2025
dc.description Ozbayrak, Ahmet/0000-0002-8091-4990; Kucukgoncu, Hurmet/0000-0001-5148-8753; en_US
dc.description.abstract Research on the design of structural members made from geopolymer concrete (GPC) remains limited. This study investigates the applicability of equivalent rectangular stress block parameters, traditionally used for reinforced concrete design, in GPC structural elements. We conducted experimental tests on 20 columns (16 GPC, 4 Ordinary Portland Cement [OPC]) and 15 beams (12 GPC, 3 OPC) produced using fly ash-based GPC and standard OPC. These tests involved subjecting the specimens to various loading conditions to measure their ultimate compressive strength and strain. The findings demonstrate that these factors significantly influence the stress block parameters in GPC samples. Notably, parameters k(1) and k(3) were compatible with ACI 318 and Eurocode 2 standards, with deviations within acceptable limits, supporting GPC's potential for use in conventional reinforced concrete frameworks. The study also reveals that GPC columns and beams have higher balanced reinforcement ratios than OPC, due to GPC's increased deformation capacity and strain values. According to the results, the average balanced reinforcement ratio of GPC column specimens is 30% higher than that of OPC, while that of GPC beam specimens is 6% higher. Variations in alkaline activation and curing methods did not significantly impact the equivalent stress block parameters. The change between the average equivalent stress block parameters obtained from GPC and OPC beam samples varies between 1% and 5%, while the change in column samples is around 1%. Although the longitudinal reinforcement ratios in the tests are variable, the averages of the calculated equivalent stress block parameters are close. The experimental results align with numerical analysis, emphasizing GPC's suitability as an alternative material in structural applications. These findings provide a basis for incorporating GPC into existing design standards, with adjustments for its distinct mechanical behavior. en_US
dc.description.sponsorship TUBITAK (The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkiye) en_US
dc.description.sponsorship TUBITAK (The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkiye) en_US
dc.identifier.doi 10.1002/suco.202401503
dc.identifier.issn 1464-4177
dc.identifier.issn 1751-7648
dc.identifier.scopus 2-s2.0-105003192229
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.1002/suco.202401503
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12573/3783
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Ernst & Sohn en_US
dc.relation.ispartof Structural Concrete en_US
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess en_US
dc.subject Balanced Reinforcement Ratio en_US
dc.subject Beam en_US
dc.subject Column en_US
dc.subject Geopolymer Concrete en_US
dc.subject Stress Block Parameters en_US
dc.title Equivalent Stress Block Parameters for Fly Ash-Based Geopolymer Concrete Structural Elements en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dspace.entity.type Publication
gdc.author.id Ozbayrak, Ahmet/0000-0002-8091-4990
gdc.author.id Kucukgoncu, Hurmet/0000-0001-5148-8753
gdc.author.scopusid 57211640818
gdc.author.scopusid 55586350600
gdc.author.wosid Ozbayrak, Ahmet/K-4236-2018
gdc.author.wosid Özbayrak, Ahmet/K-4236-2018
gdc.author.wosid Küçükgöncü, Hürmet/Abj-4453-2022
gdc.bip.impulseclass C5
gdc.bip.influenceclass C5
gdc.bip.popularityclass C5
gdc.coar.access metadata only access
gdc.coar.type text::journal::journal article
gdc.collaboration.industrial false
gdc.description.department Abdullah Gül University en_US
gdc.description.departmenttemp [Ozbayrak, Ahmet] Erciyes Univ, Engn Fac, Civil Engn Dept, Kayseri, Turkiye; [Kucukgoncu, Hurmet] Abdullah Gul Univ, Engn Fac, Civil Engn Dept, Kayseri, Turkiye en_US
gdc.description.endpage 2016 en_US
gdc.description.issue 2 en_US
gdc.description.publicationcategory Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı en_US
gdc.description.scopusquality Q2
gdc.description.startpage 1988 en_US
gdc.description.volume 26 en_US
gdc.description.woscitationindex Science Citation Index Expanded
gdc.description.wosquality Q2
gdc.identifier.openalex W4408321144
gdc.identifier.wos WOS:001438770100001
gdc.index.type WoS
gdc.index.type Scopus
gdc.oaire.accesstype HYBRID
gdc.oaire.diamondjournal false
gdc.oaire.impulse 0.0
gdc.oaire.influence 2.4895952E-9
gdc.oaire.isgreen true
gdc.oaire.keywords Balanced reinforcement ratio
gdc.oaire.keywords geopolymer concrete
gdc.oaire.keywords stress block parameters
gdc.oaire.keywords beam
gdc.oaire.keywords column
gdc.oaire.popularity 2.7494755E-9
gdc.oaire.publicfunded false
gdc.openalex.collaboration National
gdc.openalex.fwci 4.79261286
gdc.openalex.normalizedpercentile 0.86
gdc.openalex.toppercent TOP 10%
gdc.opencitations.count 0
gdc.plumx.mendeley 12
gdc.plumx.scopuscites 2
gdc.scopus.citedcount 2
gdc.virtual.author Küçükgöncü, Hürmet
gdc.wos.citedcount 1
relation.isAuthorOfPublication 9e4e6048-67c9-442a-8d37-b357a4753533
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery 9e4e6048-67c9-442a-8d37-b357a4753533
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication 665d3039-05f8-4a25-9a3c-b9550bffecef
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication 8391029c-c533-4c81-9dd0-34470a5aacb7
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication ef13a800-4c99-4124-81e0-3e25b33c0c2b
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery 665d3039-05f8-4a25-9a3c-b9550bffecef

Files