Critical Discussion on Building Energy Retrofit Policies

dc.contributor.author Utkan, Muharrem Melih
dc.contributor.author Metin, Buket
dc.date.accessioned 2025-09-25T10:43:19Z
dc.date.available 2025-09-25T10:43:19Z
dc.date.issued 2023
dc.description.abstract Building energy retrofit has become crucial in reducing the energy consumption of buildings since buildings have a significant energy consumption rate. Therefore, energy retrofit can reduce energy consumption while improving energy performance, and the building’s overall image can also be changed. However, as it is for new buildings, governmental organisations should control and audit the building energy retrofit process to provide the requirements and keep the standard. Recently, energy retrofit gained popularity worldwide with the increasing interest in ‘sustainable development’ and ‘energy efficiency’ issues due to the existing building’s role in energy consumption. In this case, different countries have developed policies based on their situations. For instance, since Europe has numerous old buildings, regulatory processes, incentives, and public awareness drive the retrofitting process. On the other hand, in the USA, companies offer energy-efficient retrofit solutions to building owners or operators due to the characteristics of the market-based driven energy retrofit process. However, Turkey has general laws on energy efficiency in buildings, such as the Energy Efficiency Law and the National Energy Efficiency Plan, as the building energy retrofit process is a brand-new topic. Thus, there is a need to develop detailed directives and incentives to manage the process efficiently. This paper discusses regulatory approaches and policies used for the building energy retrofit process in the European Union and the USA to develop proposals for the Turkish construction industry. First, it provides a comparative analysis of the policy-based process of building energy retrofit. For this purpose, the official building energy retrofit regulations are examined, pros and cons are discussed. Finally, a regulatory approach is proposed for the Turkish construction industry for building energy retrofit by investigating the challenges and opportunities. © 2025 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved. en_US
dc.identifier.doi 10.2495/ESUS230021
dc.identifier.isbn 9781845645144
dc.identifier.isbn 9781845640422
dc.identifier.isbn 9781845645328
dc.identifier.isbn 1845641736
dc.identifier.isbn 9781784663834
dc.identifier.isbn 184564042X
dc.identifier.isbn 9781845641191
dc.identifier.isbn 9781845640880
dc.identifier.isbn 9781845647629
dc.identifier.isbn 9781845645946
dc.identifier.issn 1743-3541
dc.identifier.issn 1746-448X
dc.identifier.scopus 2-s2.0-85216776446
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.2495/ESUS230021
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12573/3551
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher WITPress en_US
dc.relation.ispartof WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment en_US
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess en_US
dc.subject Building Energy en_US
dc.subject Building Energy Directive en_US
dc.subject Building Energy Regulation en_US
dc.subject Building Energy Retrofit en_US
dc.subject Building Energy Retrofit Policy en_US
dc.title Critical Discussion on Building Energy Retrofit Policies en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dspace.entity.type Publication
gdc.author.scopusid 59539120600
gdc.author.scopusid 56020768400
gdc.bip.impulseclass C5
gdc.bip.influenceclass C5
gdc.bip.popularityclass C5
gdc.coar.access open access
gdc.coar.type text::journal::journal article
gdc.collaboration.industrial false
gdc.description.department Abdullah Gül University en_US
gdc.description.departmenttemp [Utkan] Muharrem Melih, Faculty of Architecture, Abdullah Gül Üniversitesi, Kayseri, Turkey; [Metin] Buket, Faculty of Architecture, Abdullah Gül Üniversitesi, Kayseri, Turkey en_US
gdc.description.endpage 23 en_US
gdc.description.publicationcategory Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı en_US
gdc.description.scopusquality Q4
gdc.description.startpage 13 en_US
gdc.description.volume 261 en_US
gdc.description.wosquality N/A
gdc.identifier.openalex W4388722972
gdc.index.type Scopus
gdc.oaire.diamondjournal false
gdc.oaire.impulse 0.0
gdc.oaire.influence 2.5349236E-9
gdc.oaire.isgreen false
gdc.oaire.popularity 2.1399287E-9
gdc.oaire.publicfunded false
gdc.openalex.collaboration National
gdc.openalex.fwci 0.16939466
gdc.openalex.normalizedpercentile 0.38
gdc.opencitations.count 0
gdc.plumx.mendeley 5
gdc.plumx.scopuscites 2
gdc.scopus.citedcount 2
gdc.virtual.author Utkan, Muharrem Melih
gdc.virtual.author Metin, Buket
relation.isAuthorOfPublication 0ab2d1fd-8385-4d2f-a916-324df2d791a6
relation.isAuthorOfPublication 2bd4d6b9-1262-486d-aebb-f4a3736895c9
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery 0ab2d1fd-8385-4d2f-a916-324df2d791a6
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication 665d3039-05f8-4a25-9a3c-b9550bffecef
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication 2ab4f42f-5676-47e3-bb31-c00be0758f8b
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication 41a7d786-5b6d-4171-908b-e188c2ec347c
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery 665d3039-05f8-4a25-9a3c-b9550bffecef

Files