Route Choice to Inform Navigation System Design and Accessibility Analysis for Older Pedestrians: A Scoping Review
Loading...

Date
2025
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Elsevier Sci Ltd
Open Access Color
HYBRID
Green Open Access
No
OpenAIRE Downloads
OpenAIRE Views
Publicly Funded
No
Abstract
Introduction: Routing systems can support older adults by helping them overcome barriers to walking, promoting independence and well-being. The paths generated by these systems also inform urban accessibility metrics, such as those used in 15-min-city planning. Yet current systems rarely reflect the preferences or constraints of older pedestrians. Empirical studies of route choice can help close this gap by revealing how people trade off different route attributes in real settings. Methods: We conducted a scoping review, following PRISMA-ScR guidelines, of empirical studies analyzing pedestrian route choice among adults. The goal was to identify findings that could inform the design of more age-inclusive routing tools. Results: Eleven studies met the inclusion criteria, eight of which focused exclusively on older adults. Despite varied contexts, three consistent themes emerged: (i) sidewalk quality and manageable gradients; (ii) aesthetic and sensory comfort, including greenery, low noise, and good lighting; and (iii) access to benches, transit, and everyday amenities. However, most studies relied on qualitative methods, limiting direct integration into routing algorithms. Conclusions: Future work should prioritize hybrid qualitative-quantitative designs, large-scale sampling of routes, and fine-grained mapping of micro-barriers. Analyses should account for age, gender, and functional ability, and consider circular leisure walks as a distinct travel pattern. These directions can enhance the usability and equity of routing systems and urban planning frameworks.
Description
Keywords
Older Pedestrians, Route Choice, Walkability, Navigation Systems, 15-Min-City
Fields of Science
Citation
WoS Q
Q1
Scopus Q
Q2

OpenCitations Citation Count
N/A
Source
Journal of Transport & Health
Volume
44
Issue
Start Page
102151
End Page
PlumX Metrics
Citations
CrossRef : 1
Scopus : 1
Captures
Mendeley Readers : 13
SCOPUS™ Citations
1
checked on Mar 06, 2026
Web of Science™ Citations
1
checked on Mar 06, 2026
Page Views
4
checked on Mar 06, 2026
Google Scholar™

OpenAlex FWCI
0.0
Sustainable Development Goals
11
SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND COMMUNITIES


