Integrated Quantitative Modelling for the Dimension Stone Quality Evaluation: Implications for Sustainable Resource Management
No Thumbnail Available
Date
2025
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Springer Heidelberg
Open Access Color
Green Open Access
No
OpenAIRE Downloads
OpenAIRE Views
Publicly Funded
No
Abstract
The growing demand for dimensional stones in construction and monument conservation requires fast, repeatable and scientifically valid quality assessment procedures. The present study, in this context, established a solid foundation for quantifying the quality of dimension stones by adopting two quantitative methods: the Suitability Index (SI) and Dimension Stone Field Performance Coefficient (DSFPC). Both methods were coded in the MATLAB environment and implemented for 20 different rock types used in various dimension stone applications in Turkey. Evaluations based on the above-mentioned methods demonstrate that the DSFPC provides a more conservative assessment than the SI method. Additionally, engineering interpretations derived from the SI and DSFPC approaches are compared with recently published classification systems developed for the dimension stone industry. Focusing on this comparison, it is concluded that the adopted methods offer a more holistic evaluation framework compared to the approaches based solely on a single input parameter, such as effective porosity (ne), uniaxial compressive strength (UCS), or B & ouml;hme abrasion value (BAV) of rocks. Furthermore, it is concluded that the adopted methods complement each other by yielding supportive outcomes. The coded methods can be adapted to other lithological series and integrated with spatial information systems to support decision-making in mining and construction sectors. From this point of view, the present study may be considered a case study supporting holistic approaches to sustainable resource management in the dimension stone industry.
Description
Keywords
Dimension Stone, Quality Assessment, Rock Properties, Engineering Interpretation
Turkish CoHE Thesis Center URL
Fields of Science
Citation
WoS Q
Q3
Scopus Q
Q1

OpenCitations Citation Count
N/A
Source
Modeling Earth Systems and Environment
Volume
11
Issue
6
Start Page
End Page
PlumX Metrics
Citations
Scopus : 0
Captures
Mendeley Readers : 2
Page Views
2
checked on Feb 03, 2026
Google Scholar™

OpenAlex FWCI
0.0
Sustainable Development Goals
9
INDUSTRY, INNOVATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE

12
RESPONSIBLE CONSUMPTION AND PRODUCTION


