Investigating the Role of Stator Slot Indents in Minimizing Flooded Motor Fluid Damping Loss
Loading...
Date
2023
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
MDPI
Open Access Color
GOLD
Green Open Access
Yes
OpenAIRE Downloads
12
OpenAIRE Views
99
Publicly Funded
No
Abstract
This research examines how fluid damping loss affects the operation of a two-pole, 5.5 HP (4 kW) induction machine (IM) within the context of different slot opening configurations developed for downhole water pump applications. Since these motors operate with their cavities filled with fluid, the variations in fluid viscosity and density, compared to air, result in the occurrence of damping losses. Furthermore, this loss can be attributed to the motor's stator and rotor surface geometry, as the liquid within the motor cavity moves unrestrictedly within the motor housing. This study involves the examination of the damping loss in a 24-slot IM under different stator slot indentations. The investigation utilizes computational fluid dynamics (CFD) finite element analysis (FEA) and is subsequently validated through experiments. The aim of this work is to emphasize the significance of fluid damping loss in submerged machines. Results reveal that the damping loss exceeds 8% of the motor output power when the stator surface has indentations, and it diminishes to 3.2% of the output power when a custom wedge structure is employed to eliminate these surface indentations.
Description
Tekgun, Burak/0000-0003-2720-8816;
ORCID
Keywords
Fluid Damping Loss, Flooded Motor, Induction Machine, FEA, CFD, fluid damping loss, induction machine, TJ1-1570, Mechanical engineering and machinery, CFD, FEA, flooded motor
Fields of Science
0211 other engineering and technologies, 0202 electrical engineering, electronic engineering, information engineering, 02 engineering and technology
Citation
WoS Q
Q2
Scopus Q
Q2

OpenCitations Citation Count
2
Source
Machines
Volume
11
Issue
12
Start Page
1088
End Page
PlumX Metrics
Citations
Scopus : 2
Captures
Mendeley Readers : 2
Google Scholar™


