Expanding the Boundary of Brand Extensions Through Brand Relationship Quality
Loading...
Date
2016
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Vilnius Gediminas Tech Univ
Open Access Color
GOLD
Green Open Access
Yes
OpenAIRE Downloads
66
OpenAIRE Views
144
Publicly Funded
No
Abstract
Research on brand extensions identifies the concept of perceived fit as the prime determinant of success. Yet, it is not difficult to find examples of brands that have been extended successfully into "perceptually distant" domains. In an attempt to resolve this discrepancy between research insights and practical experiences, the study investigates the role of Brand Relationship Quality (BRQ) as a critical factor determining consumer responses to brand extensions. The proposed model is tested separately in the context of three different fit scenarios (high, moderate, and low) with data from 502 consumers. The results indicate that BRQ and perceived fit exert independent effects on consumer responses and complement each other as they jointly influence evaluations of brand extensions. The study therefore extends existing theory by providing evidence that the brand extension phenomenon cannot be explained justly without including constructs that portray personal relationships consumers develop with brands and provides insights for marketers and researchers as to how such relationships can be integrated in formulations of successful brand extension strategies.
Description
Yilmaz, Cengiz/0000-0002-9383-1457
ORCID
Keywords
Brand Extension, Brand Relationship Quality, Perceived Fit, Consumer Behaviour, Consumer Responses, Brand Management, brand extension, HF5001-6182, perceived fit, consumer behaviour, consumer responses, Business, 650, brand relationship quality, brand management
Fields of Science
0502 economics and business, 05 social sciences
Citation
WoS Q
Q1
Scopus Q
Q1

OpenCitations Citation Count
9
Source
Journal of Business Economics and Management
Volume
17
Issue
6
Start Page
930
End Page
944
PlumX Metrics
Citations
CrossRef : 4
Scopus : 10
Captures
Mendeley Readers : 59
SCOPUS™ Citations
10
checked on Apr 14, 2026
Web of Science™ Citations
7
checked on Apr 14, 2026
Page Views
1
checked on Apr 14, 2026
Downloads
2
checked on Apr 14, 2026
Google Scholar™


