Çelebi, Mehmet Celil

Loading...
Profile Picture
Name Variants
Celebi, Mehmet Celil
Mehmet Celil
Mehmet Celebi
Çelebi, MC Celebi
Job Title
Dr. Öğr. Üyesi
Email Address
mehmet.celebi@agu.edu.tr
Main Affiliation
06.01. Siyaset Bilimi ve Uluslararası İlişkiler
Status
Current Staff
Website
Scopus Author ID
Turkish CoHE Profile ID
Google Scholar ID
WoS Researcher ID

Sustainable Development Goals

SDG data is not available
This researcher does not have a Scopus ID.
Documents

2

Citations

0

Scholarly Output

3

Articles

3

Views / Downloads

67/13

Supervised MSc Theses

0

Supervised PhD Theses

0

WoS Citation Count

0

Scopus Citation Count

0

WoS h-index

0

Scopus h-index

0

Patents

0

Projects

0

WoS Citations per Publication

0.00

Scopus Citations per Publication

0.00

Open Access Source

0

Supervised Theses

0

Google Analytics Visitor Traffic

JournalCount
Nationalism and Ethnic Politics1
Turkish Studies1
Current Page: 1 / 1

Scopus Quartile Distribution

Competency Cloud

GCRIS Competency Cloud

Scholarly Output Search Results

Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
  • Article
    Mincing Words: The Three Layers of the AKP's Narrative on Kurdish Politics
    (Routledge Journals, Taylor & Francis Ltd, 2020) Celebi, Mehmet Celil
    In 2009-2015, the Justice and Development Party (AKP) put forward several initiatives to end insurgency in Kurdish majority areas. However, successive "openings" failed to make progress. The electoral and international goals of the AKP gradually became incongruent with the peace process, and the AKP espoused heavy-handed tactics in July 2015. The ups and downs of the process in 2009-2015 show that it was already fragile. Some causes of this fragility were external to the AKP, such as the opposition parties' eagerness to use the process to poach nationalist voters and the PKK's violence. However, I argue that the contradictory nature of the AKP's narrative was also a crucial factor. The party's earlier narrative required the strict separation of two layers: security policies to fight terrorists and democratization policies to address the legitimate grievances of citizens. However, the intersubjective strategies that it experimented later required a gray area between these two fields. The AKP, instead of changing strategies, has constructed a three-layered, contradictory narrative.
  • Article
    BÖLÜNMÜŞ TOPLUMLARDA ANAYASA YARGISI: İSRAİL YÜKSEK MAHKEMESİ KARARLARI IŞIĞINDA İSRAİL’DE VATANDAŞLIĞIN SINIRLARI
    (Legal Yayıncılık San. ve Tic. Ltd. Şti., 2024) Celebi, Gulce Tarhan; Celebi, Mehmet Celil
    Bu makale, bölünmüş toplumlarda milli kimlik ile vatandaşlar bütünü arasındaki sınırın belirlenmesinde yüksek mahkemelerin rolünü incelemektedir, özellikle İsrail Yüksek Mahkemesi'nin kararlarına odaklanarak. İsrail'in dini ve etnik farklılıklarla bölünmüş bir toplum olduğu bağlamda, mahkemelerin milli kimliğin ve vatandaşlığın tanımını nasıl etkilediği ve bu sürecin nasıl işlediği ele alınmaktadır. Makale, İsrail Yüksek Mahkemesi'nin kritik kararlarını söylem analiziyle inceleyerek, Yahudi kimliği ve İsrailli Araplar arasındaki ayrımcılık davalara odaklanmaktadır. Ayrıca, İsrailli Araplar için eşit vatandaşlık haklarını belirleyen kararların yetersizliği ve “Temel Yasa: Yahudi Halkı'nın Ulus-Devleti” yasasının İYM üzerindeki etkileri tartışılmaktadır. Bu makale, bölünmüş toplumlarda yargının milli kimliğin inşasında nasıl merkezi bir rol oynadığını vurgulamaktadır.
  • Article
    The Trajectory of ‘tanpınar Studies’ From Post-Kemalism To Global Tanpınar
    (Routledge, 2025) Çelebi, M.C.
    Tanpınar holds a pivotal place in Turkish literature, shaping debates on Turkey's history. This article traces his critical reception from post-Kemalist readings to global interpretations. In the 1980s, he was central to post-Kemalist critiques of modernization; later, his works were reinterpreted through global modernity. Global Tanpınar teaches us two lessons: intellectually, it calls for a post-post-Kemalist perspective that situates Turkey's historical experience within the context of global crises. Culturally, it advocates a policy that goes beyond the traditional East-West synthesis and ‘standard’ multiculturalism by transcending the essentialist dichotomies that underpin global inequalities. © 2025 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.