Şık, Kübra

Profile Picture
Profile URL
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12573/2820
Name Variants
K. Sık
Sik Keser, Kübra
Şik Keser, Kübra
Job Title
Öğr. Gör.
Email Address
kubra.keser@agu.edu.tr
Main Affiliation
09. Yabancı Diller Yüksekokulu
Status
Current Staff
Website
ORCID ID
0000-0003-1492-5883
Scopus Author ID
Turkish CoHE Profile ID
119777
Google Scholar ID
s23X7XgAAAAJ
WoS Researcher ID
Files
5364_Kübra_Sik_Keser.jpeg (11.39 KB)

Sustainable Development Goals

4

QUALITY EDUCATION
QUALITY EDUCATION Logo

1

Research Products
This researcher does not have a Scopus ID.
This researcher does not have a WoS ID.
Scholarly Output

1

Articles

0

Views / Downloads

0/0

Supervised MSc Theses

0

Supervised PhD Theses

0

WoS Citation Count

0

Scopus Citation Count

1

WoS h-index

0

Scopus h-index

1

Patents

0

Projects

0

WoS Citations per Publication

0.00

Scopus Citations per Publication

1.00

Open Access Source

0

Supervised Theses

0

Google Analytics Visitor Traffic

Journals data is not available

Scopus Quartile Distribution

Quartile distribution chart data is not available

Competency Cloud

GCRIS Competency Cloud

Filters

20241
Reset filters

Settings

Scholarly Output Search Results

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
  • Thumbnail Image
    Book Part
    Citation - Scopus: 1
    Upholding Academic Integrity in EAP
    (Springer Nature, 2024) Şik Keser, Kübra; Razı, Salim
    Given that academic integrity is an important component in academic writing courses, outlining the types of academic misconduct that are mostly encountered in EAP settings along with the possible causes can lead to possible solutions and suggestions. Thus, in this chapter, we depict the types of academic dishonesty in EAP settings based mainly on writing skills and portray the possible causes along with the attainable suggestions. Studies on academic integrity show that plagiarism is the most common type of academic misconduct. Language barrier appears to be the main reason, and literature supports that international students have a greater tendency to plagiarize due to feeling incompetent in the target language. Moreover, with advancements in remote learning methodologies and technological tools, learners have a propensity to use AI tools while creating their assignments, believed to be a problem beyond plagiarism. Lastly, contract cheating is another common type of academic dishonesty in EAP settings. The reasons are highlighted as discontent about the setting of the instruction and learning and the attitude of learners toward various ways of cheating. For all these problems and causes, a penalty would be regarded as a possible solution or suggestion. However, instead of focusing on the results of academic dishonesty and sanctions, solutions should be centered on the pedagogic policies developed to prevent academic misconduct. © 2025 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.