Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu

Permanent URI for this collectionhttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12573/395

Browse

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Article
    Citation - Scopus: 52
    Solving an Ammunition Distribution Network Design Problem Using Multi-Objective Mathematical Modeling, Combined AHP-TOPSIS, and GIS
    (Elsevier Ltd, 2019-03) Akgün, Ibrahim; Erdal, Hamit
    We study a strategic-level ammunution distribution network design problem (ADNDP) where the purpose is to determine the locations and the service assignments of main, regional, and local depots in order to meet the ammunition needs of military units considering several factors, e.g., stock levels at the depots, costs, and risk levels of depot locations. ADNDP is a real-world and large-scale problem for which scientific decision making methods do not exist. We propose a methodology that uses multi-objective mathematical modeling, Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), The Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS), and Geographic Information System (GIS) to solve the problem. The multi-objective mathematical model determines the locations and the service assignments of depots considering two objectives, namely, to minimize transportation costs and to minimize risk scores of main depot locations. The risk score of a depot location indicates how vulnerable the location is to disruptions and is determined by a combined AHP-TOPSIS analysis where TOPSIS is used to compute the risk scores and AHP is used to compute the weights needed by TOPSIS for the identified risk attributes. The GIS analysis is conducted to determine the potential depot locations using map layers based on spatial criteria. We have applied the proposed methodology in designing and evaluating a real ammunition distribution network under different scenarios in collaboration and cooperation with the area experts. We have employed the weighted-sum method to find non-dominated solutions for each scenario and discussed their tradeoffs with the area experts. The purpose of this paper is to present the proposed methodology, findings, and insights. © 2019 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
  • Article
    Citation - WoS: 102
    Citation - Scopus: 119
    Risk Based Facility Location by Using Fault Tree Analysis in Disaster Management
    (Pergamon-Elsevier Science Ltd, 2015-04) Akgun, Ibrahim; Gumusbuga, Ferhat; Tansel, Barbaros
    Determining the locations of facilities for prepositioning supplies to be used during a disaster is a strategic decision that directly affects the success of disaster response operations. Locating such facilities close to the disaster-prone areas is of utmost importance to minimize response time. However, this is also risky because the facility may be disrupted and hence may not support the demand point(s). In this study, we develop an optimization model that minimizes the risk that a demand point may be exposed to because it is not supported by the located facilities. The purpose is to choose the locations such that a reliable facility network to support the demand points is constructed. The risk for a demand point is calculated as the multiplication of the (probability of the) threat (e.g., earthquake), the vulnerability of the demand point (the probability that it is not supported by the facilities), and consequence (value or possible loss at the demand point due to threat). The vulnerability of a demand point is computed by using fault tree analysis and incorporated into the optimization model innovatively. To our knowledge, this paper is the first to use such an approach. The resulting non-linear integer program is linearized and solved as a linear integer program. The locations produced by the proposed model are compared to those produced by the p-center model with respect to risk value, coverage distance, and covered population by using several test problems. The model is also applied in a real problem. The results indicate that taking the risk into account explicitly may create significant differences in the risk levels. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.