Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Permanent URI for this collectionhttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12573/395
Browse
3 results
Search Results
Article Citation - WoS: 1Citation - Scopus: 1Numerical Analysis and Experimental Comparison of Stress and Stiffness Parameters of Steel Reinforced Geopolymer Concrete Columns(Elsevier Sci Ltd, 2026-01) Ozbayrak, Ahmet; Kucukgoncu, Hurmet; Aslanbay, Huseyin Hilmi; Aslanbay, Yuksel Gul; Altun, FatihDespite extensive research, Geopolymer concrete (GPC) lacks reinforced concrete construction and design specifications. Developing such specifications requires comprehensive studies to promote the use of GPC, which is known for its superior performance and environmental benefits compared to ordinary Portland cement concrete (OPC). This study numerically investigated and compared the behavior and strength of fly ash-based geopolymer-reinforced concrete columns with the experimental results. Comparisons with OPC were made based on existing specifications. Herein, FEM analyses were conducted on 16 GPC and 4 OPC columns under eccentric axial compressive loads. Parameters such as eccentricity, reinforcement ratio, curing method, and activation solution ratios were varied. According to average numerical results, the GPC columns have 7% more moment capacity and 30% more curvature values than OPC. Moreover, GPC columns absorbed more energy than OPC columns. Also, GPC columns have higher axial load and bending moment carrying capacities than OPC for numerical results. Error analysis between FEM and experimental data revealed a strong correlation, with MAPE values of 8.88% (axial load) and 7.20% (moment) for GPC columns, confirming the reliability of the numerical model. ACI 318 and Eurocode 2 specifications were deemed applicable for GPC columns, provided axial loads are limited per TEC 2018.Article Citation - WoS: 9Citation - Scopus: 8Stress and Damage Distribution Analysis of Steel Reinforced Geopolymer Concrete Beams: Finite Element Method and Experimental Comparison Under Varying Design Parameters(Elsevier, 2025-06) Ozbayrak, Ahmet; Kucukgoncu, Hurmet; Aslanbay, Huseyin Hilmi; Aslanbay, Yuksel GulGeopolymer concrete (GPC) is a sustainable and eco-friendly alternative to ordinary Portland cement-based concrete (OPC). However, its application in reinforced concrete structures remains limited due to insufficient research on structural performance. This study examines the effects of tensile reinforcement ratio, sodium silicate/sodium hydroxide ratio, and curing method on GPCreinforced concrete (GPC-RC) beams. Experimental and numerical bending tests were performed on GPC and OPC beams with similar tensile reinforcement and strength properties. Load- displacement and moment-curvature relationships were obtained and compared, while stress and stiffness behaviors were analyzed numerically. The results show that curing methods and reinforcement ratios significantly influence GPC beam behavior. In GPC samples, numerical and experimental displacement and load values differed by approximately 10 % at both yield and ultimate points. For OPC, these differences were 35 % and 14 % at the yield point and 17 % and 25 % at the ultimate point. GPC exhibited distinct stress and damage distribution characteristics compared to OPC. The finite element models were statistically validated, confirming their consistency with experimental results. These findings contribute to the understanding of GPC's structural behavior and provide guidance for its design and optimization in reinforced concrete applications.Article Citation - WoS: 2Citation - Scopus: 2Experimental and Numerical Analysis of Damage and Crack Behavior in Geopolymer and Ordinary Portland Cement Reinforced Concrete Columns(Elsevier, 2025-10) Ozbayrak, Ahmet; Kucukgoncu, Hurmet; Aslanbay, Yuksel Gul; Aslanbay, Huseyin HilmiThis study evaluates and compares the structural behavior of reinforced concrete columns produced with geopolymer concrete (GPC) and ordinary Portland cement (OPC) under eccentric axial loading, aiming to investigate GPC's potential as a sustainable alternative. A total of twenty columns with varying longitudinal reinforcement ratios, curing methods, eccentricities, and geopolymer formulations were experimentally tested. Displacement measurements at each load increment were obtained using a total station, allowing crack pattern tracking at key stages such as first cracking, yielding, and ultimate failure. These observations were schematically documented using AutoCAD. Additionally, finite element models were developed in ABAQUS using the Concrete Damage Plasticity (CDP) model, with material parameters calibrated based on experimental compressive and tensile strengths, elastic modulus, and fracture energy. Results indicated that increasing eccentricity reduces axial load capacity while increasing lateral deformation. While the reinforcement ratio did not significantly affect axial strength, it increased displacement demand. Due to their distinct microstructural characteristics, GPC columns exhibited greater deformation capacity and narrower, more localized crack patterns than OPC columns. Furthermore, the sodium silicate/sodium hydroxide (SS/SH) ratio and curing duration significantly influenced the structural response of GPC. Numerical simulations showed strong agreement with experimental results regarding load-displacement behavior and damage distribution. These findings demonstrate that GPC can serve as a reliable and sustainable alternative to OPC in structural column applications, provided its specific material properties are considered in design and analysis.