Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Permanent URI for this collectionhttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12573/395
Browse
3 results
Search Results
Article Failure Mechanisms and Damage Evolution of Geopolymer Concrete Beams under Flexural Loading: Experimental Investigation and Finite Element Analysis(SAGE Publications Inc, 2026) Ozbayrak, Ahmet; Aslanbay, Yuksel Gul; Aslanbay, Huseyin Hilmi; Altun, Fatih; Kucukgoncu, HurmetThis study investigates the failure behavior and damage mechanisms of geopolymer concrete (GPC) and ordinary Portland cement (OPC) reinforced concrete beams through a combined experimental and numerical approach. Flexural tests were conducted, and then displacement and crack development were monitored using high-precision total station measurements. Numerical analyses were performed using ABAQUS, and the consistency between experimental observations and numerical predictions was evaluated at yield and failure stages to characterize inelastic behavior and damage progression. The effects of key parameters, including tensile reinforcement ratio, geopolymer concrete formulations, and curing methods, on cracking behavior, stiffness degradation, and failure modes were investigated in detail. The results indicate that increasing the tensile reinforcement ratio enhances flexural stiffness and load-bearing capacity while reducing ductility at advanced damage stages. Compared to OPC beams, GPC beams exhibited narrower and more distributed crack patterns due to their distinct microstructural characteristics. Quantitatively, GPC beams exhibited approximately 15% greater deformation in the compression zone at failure, while tensile reinforcement strains were up to 23% higher at yield compared to OPC beams. In addition, the maximum crack width at failure in GPC beams was approximately 50% lower than that of OPC beams. These results indicate that, despite similar strength levels, GPC beams exhibit higher deformation capacity and more distributed damage behavior. The findings demonstrate that geopolymer concrete exhibits distinct failure characteristics compared to OPC and should be explicitly considered in structural design to improve damage control and failure prediction. Overall, the study highlights the potential of geopolymer concrete as a reliable and sustainable structural material.Article Citation - WoS: 2Citation - Scopus: 2Numerical Analysis and Experimental Comparison of Stress and Stiffness Parameters of Steel Reinforced Geopolymer Concrete Columns(Elsevier Sci Ltd, 2026-01) Ozbayrak, Ahmet; Kucukgoncu, Hurmet; Aslanbay, Huseyin Hilmi; Aslanbay, Yuksel Gul; Altun, FatihDespite extensive research, Geopolymer concrete (GPC) lacks reinforced concrete construction and design specifications. Developing such specifications requires comprehensive studies to promote the use of GPC, which is known for its superior performance and environmental benefits compared to ordinary Portland cement concrete (OPC). This study numerically investigated and compared the behavior and strength of fly ash-based geopolymer-reinforced concrete columns with the experimental results. Comparisons with OPC were made based on existing specifications. Herein, FEM analyses were conducted on 16 GPC and 4 OPC columns under eccentric axial compressive loads. Parameters such as eccentricity, reinforcement ratio, curing method, and activation solution ratios were varied. According to average numerical results, the GPC columns have 7% more moment capacity and 30% more curvature values than OPC. Moreover, GPC columns absorbed more energy than OPC columns. Also, GPC columns have higher axial load and bending moment carrying capacities than OPC for numerical results. Error analysis between FEM and experimental data revealed a strong correlation, with MAPE values of 8.88% (axial load) and 7.20% (moment) for GPC columns, confirming the reliability of the numerical model. ACI 318 and Eurocode 2 specifications were deemed applicable for GPC columns, provided axial loads are limited per TEC 2018.Article Citation - WoS: 5Citation - Scopus: 5Experimental and Numerical Analysis of Damage and Crack Behavior in Geopolymer and Ordinary Portland Cement Reinforced Concrete Columns(Elsevier, 2025-10) Ozbayrak, Ahmet; Kucukgoncu, Hurmet; Aslanbay, Yuksel Gul; Aslanbay, Huseyin HilmiThis study evaluates and compares the structural behavior of reinforced concrete columns produced with geopolymer concrete (GPC) and ordinary Portland cement (OPC) under eccentric axial loading, aiming to investigate GPC's potential as a sustainable alternative. A total of twenty columns with varying longitudinal reinforcement ratios, curing methods, eccentricities, and geopolymer formulations were experimentally tested. Displacement measurements at each load increment were obtained using a total station, allowing crack pattern tracking at key stages such as first cracking, yielding, and ultimate failure. These observations were schematically documented using AutoCAD. Additionally, finite element models were developed in ABAQUS using the Concrete Damage Plasticity (CDP) model, with material parameters calibrated based on experimental compressive and tensile strengths, elastic modulus, and fracture energy. Results indicated that increasing eccentricity reduces axial load capacity while increasing lateral deformation. While the reinforcement ratio did not significantly affect axial strength, it increased displacement demand. Due to their distinct microstructural characteristics, GPC columns exhibited greater deformation capacity and narrower, more localized crack patterns than OPC columns. Furthermore, the sodium silicate/sodium hydroxide (SS/SH) ratio and curing duration significantly influenced the structural response of GPC. Numerical simulations showed strong agreement with experimental results regarding load-displacement behavior and damage distribution. These findings demonstrate that GPC can serve as a reliable and sustainable alternative to OPC in structural column applications, provided its specific material properties are considered in design and analysis.