Arık, Engin

Profile URL
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12573/2765
Name Variants
Arik, Engin & Engin Arık
Job Title
Prof. Dr.
Email Address
engin.arik@agu.edu.tr
Main Affiliation
06.02. Psikoloji
Status
Current Staff
Website
ORCID ID
0000-0002-0981-257X
Scopus Author ID
55509403800
 55509403800
Turkish CoHE Profile ID
95DA2318895A7263
Google Scholar ID
nZbh9QYAAAAJ&hl
WoS Researcher ID
No research topics data found.

Sustainable Development Goals

NO POVERTY1
NO POVERTY
0
Research Products
ZERO HUNGER2
ZERO HUNGER
0
Research Products
GOOD HEALTH AND WELL-BEING3
GOOD HEALTH AND WELL-BEING
0
Research Products
QUALITY EDUCATION4
QUALITY EDUCATION
0
Research Products
GENDER EQUALITY5
GENDER EQUALITY
0
Research Products
CLEAN WATER AND SANITATION6
CLEAN WATER AND SANITATION
0
Research Products
AFFORDABLE AND CLEAN ENERGY7
AFFORDABLE AND CLEAN ENERGY
0
Research Products
DECENT WORK AND ECONOMIC GROWTH8
DECENT WORK AND ECONOMIC GROWTH
0
Research Products
INDUSTRY, INNOVATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE9
INDUSTRY, INNOVATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE
0
Research Products
REDUCED INEQUALITIES10
REDUCED INEQUALITIES
0
Research Products
SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND COMMUNITIES11
SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND COMMUNITIES
0
Research Products
RESPONSIBLE CONSUMPTION AND PRODUCTION12
RESPONSIBLE CONSUMPTION AND PRODUCTION
0
Research Products
CLIMATE ACTION13
CLIMATE ACTION
0
Research Products
LIFE BELOW WATER14
LIFE BELOW WATER
0
Research Products
LIFE ON LAND15
LIFE ON LAND
0
Research Products
PEACE, JUSTICE AND STRONG INSTITUTIONS16
PEACE, JUSTICE AND STRONG INSTITUTIONS
1
Research Products
PARTNERSHIPS FOR THE GOALS17
PARTNERSHIPS FOR THE GOALS
0
Research Products
Documents

21

Citations

121

h-index

6

Go to Scopus profile
This researcher does not have a WoS ID.
No records found in other affiliations.
Scholarly Output

3

Articles

3

Views / Downloads

232/29

Supervised MSc Theses

0

Supervised PhD Theses

0

WoS Citation Count

5

Scopus Citation Count

5

Patents

0

Projects

4

WoS Citations per Publication

1.67

Scopus Citations per Publication

1.67

Open Access Source

1

Supervised Theses

0

JournalCount
Journal of Cognitive Science1
Politics1
SN Social Sciences1
Current Page: 1 / 1

Scopus Quartile Distribution

Competency Cloud

GCRIS Competency Cloud
Author of Publication: search.filters.isAuthorOfPublication.afdfdc5b-8f68-418f-a975-eeee444a8862

Scholarly Output Search Results

Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
  • Article
    Citation - Scopus: 1
    The Communication Strategies of Ideologically Polarized Civil Society Organizations on Twitter: The Case of Turkey
    (Springer Nature, 2022) Akboga, Sema; Arik, Engin
    We investigated how ideologically polarized civil society organizations (CSOs) in Turkey use Twitter. We analyzed tweets from 20 CSOs in Turkey for a period of 7 months by using the Information-Community-Action framework. For all types of CSOs, the number of information tweets was higher than the number of action tweets, which, in turn, was higher in number than the community tweets. Religious/conservative and anti-government CSOs posted significantly more tweets than secular and pro-government CSOs, respectively. Religious/conservative and pro-government CSOs posted more information and community tweets than secular and anti-government CSOs, respectively. The number of anti-government CSOs’ action tweets was higher than that of pro-government CSOs. We, therefore, propose that the ideological stance of a CSO is a factor affecting the content of its tweets in societies where CSOs are politically polarized. © 2024 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
  • Article
    What Does the Bibliometrics of an Interdisciplinary Field Tell Us?: The Case of Cognitive Science
    (Seoul Natl Univ, inst Cognitive Science, 2023) Arik, Beril T.; Arik, Engin
    This study investigated the bibliometric characteristics of an interdisciplinary field, Cognitive Science, which consists of contributions from diverse fields such as psychology, computer science, philosophy, linguistics, and anthropology, among others. The results showed that there were 4,711 publications in Web of Science between 1900 and 2017, with an exponential increase in the number of publications in recent years. About two-thirds of publications were classified as social science, of which 41% were in the field of psychology. Seventy percent of the publications were journal articles, half of the publications were written by researchers in the USA, and 95% of the publications were in English. Corpus analyses of abstracts and keywords showed that frequently used words included cognitive, science, research, theory, model, cognition, information, learning, and psychology. These analyses also showed that research in this field centered on the common themes of cognition, information, psychology, language, learning, representation, artificial intelligence, and mind before 2010 and focused on more restricted themes such as embodied and extended cognition, morality and religion, quantum, and music after 2010.
  • Article
    Citation - WoS: 5
    Citation - Scopus: 4
    Polarisation Over the Meaning of Democracy: The Case of Political Parties in Turkey
    (Sage Publications Ltd, 2023) Akboga, Sema; Sahin, Osman; Arik, Engin
    As the primary means of political organisation, political parties remain vital to contemporary democracies, making it important to investigate their understanding of democracy. This study explores the themes with which five largest political parties in Turkey associate democracy. We studied tweets posted by official accounts of these parties' headquarters and branches, as well as by other Twitter accounts that are institutionally linked to these parties. We found significant differences between the government bloc and the opposition bloc as well as between People Alliance and Nation Alliance in terms of the themes with which they associate democracy. The government bloc and People Alliance use themes such as national will and military coups while referring to democracy. The opposition bloc and Nation Alliance emphasise themes such as equality, freedom of the press, and justice. We conclude that parties' and blocs' different attitudes towards democracy are indicators of political polarisation in Turkey.