Gazioğlu, Merve

Profile Picture
Profile URL
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12573/2759
Name Variants
Gazioğlu, Merve
M Gazioğlu
Job Title
Öğr. Gör.
Email Address
merve.gazioglu@agu.edu.tr
Main Affiliation
09. Yabancı Diller Yüksekokulu
Status
Current Staff
Website
ORCID ID
0000-0001-9065-6801
Scopus Author ID
Turkish CoHE Profile ID
108953
Google Scholar ID
WoS Researcher ID
Files
5274_Merve_Gazioglu.JPG (5.84 KB)

Sustainable Development Goals

SDG data is not available
This researcher does not have a Scopus ID.
This researcher does not have a WoS ID.
Scholarly Output

1

Articles

1

Views / Downloads

3/0

Supervised MSc Theses

0

Supervised PhD Theses

0

WoS Citation Count

0

Scopus Citation Count

0

WoS h-index

0

Scopus h-index

0

Patents

0

Projects

0

WoS Citations per Publication

0.00

Scopus Citations per Publication

0.00

Open Access Source

1

Supervised Theses

0

Google Analytics Visitor Traffic

JournalCount
Journal of Language Research (Online)1
Current Page: 1 / 1

Scopus Quartile Distribution

Quartile distribution chart data is not available

Competency Cloud

GCRIS Competency Cloud

Filters

20241
Reset filters

Settings

Scholarly Output Search Results

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
  • Thumbnail Image
    Article
    Identifying Grammatical Errors and Mistakes via a Written Learner Corpus in a Foreign Language Context
    (2024) Aydin, Selami; Gazioğlu, Merve
    Foreign language learners of English have difficulty in applying grammar rules in writing despite prolonged training focusing on grammar. This corpus-driven error analysis study examines English as a foreign language (EFL) learners’ grammatical errors through a written learner corpus, which contains essays written by Level 2 and 3 students in a language program at a state university. The study also aims to reveal whether they make any improvement within a term. Using James’s (1998) taxonomy of errors, the data were analyzed via a corpus tool, “AntConc”. The results of descriptive analysis for error frequency showed that the most common grammatical errors were of verb conjugation, prepositions, articles, grammatical numbers, and voice, respectively. The study also showed no significant progress for Level 2 learners while Level 3 learners slightly improved by rectifying the number of errors.