WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Permanent URI for this collectionhttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12573/394
Browse
3 results
Search Results
Article Citation - WoS: 57Citation - Scopus: 73Removal of Heavy Metals from Aluminum Anodic Oxidation Wastewaters by Membrane Filtration(Springer Heidelberg, 2018-05-27) Ates, Nuray; Uzal, NigmetAluminum manufacturing has been reported as one of the largest industries and wastewater produced from the aluminum industry may cause significant environmental problems due to variable pH, high heavy metal concentration, conductivity, and organic load. The management of this wastewater with a high pollution load is of great importance for practitioners in the aluminum sector. There are hardly any studies available on membrane treatment of wastewater originated from anodic oxidation. The aim of this study is to evaluate the best treatment and reuse alternative for aluminum industry wastewater using membrane filtration. Additionally, the performance of chemical precipitation, which is the existing treatment used in the aluminum facility, was also compared with membrane filtration. Wastewater originated from anodic oxidation coating process of an aluminum profile manufacturing facility in Kayseri (Turkey) was used in the experiments. The characterization of raw wastewater was in very low pH (e.g., 3) with high aluminum concentration and conductivity values. Membrane experiments were carried out with ultrafiltration (PTUF), nanofiltration (NF270), and reverse osmosis (SW30) membranes with MWCO 5000, 200-400, and 100 Da, respectively. For the chemical precipitation experiments, FeCl3 and FeSO4 chemicals presented lower removal performances for aluminum and chromium, which were below 35% at ambient wastewater pH 3. The membrane filtration experimental results show that, both NF and RO membranes tested could effectively remove aluminum, total chromium and nickel (> 90%) from the aluminum production wastewater. The RO (SW30) membrane showed a slightly higher performance at 20 bar operating pressure in terms of conductivity removal values (90%) than the NF 270 membrane (87%). Although similar removal performances were observed for heavy metals and conductivity by NF270 and SW30, significantly higher fluxes were obtained in NF270 membrane filtration at any pressure that there were more than three times the flux values in SW30 membrane filtration. Due to the lower heavy metal (< 65%) and conductivity (< 30%) removal performances of UF membrane, it could be evaluated as pretreatment followed by NF filtration to protect and extend NF membrane life. The water treated by both NF and RO could be recycled back into the process to be reused with economic and environmental benefits.Article Citation - WoS: 3Citation - Scopus: 3Investigation of the Treatability of Pre-Coagulated Slaughterhouse Wastewater Using Dead-End Filtration(Wiley, 2021-03-15) Ozdemir, Safiye; Uzal, Nigmet; Gokcek, Oznur BegumBACKGROUND In the present study, the performance of the membrane process, one of the advanced treatment methods that can enable the reuse of slaughterhouse wastewater, was evaluated. The wastewater was treated using ultrafiltration (UF) (10, 50 kDa), nanofiltration (NF) (150-300 DA) and reverse osmosis (RO) (500 kDa) membranes alone, and UF + NF, UF + RO membrane combinations at different pressures. In addition to rejection and permeate flux considerations, it was attempted to select the most effective membrane by performing scanning electron microscopy, Fourier transform infrared, contact angle, and atomic force microscopy analyses of the membranes used. RESULTS As a result of the experiments, the highest flux was observed at 5 bar for the 50 kDa UF membrane. When the performances of the sequential application of 10 and 50 kDa UF membranes followed by NF and RO membranes were evaluated, the highest flux was obtained for the sequential application of the 50 kDa UF membrane with the NF membrane as 19.68 and 9.05 L m(-2) h, respectively. CONCLUSION The highest chemical oxygen demand (COD) removal was obtained for the RO membrane at 20 bar as 88.67%, and for the 50 kDa UF + RO sequential application, the COD removal was increased from 70% to 88.67%. (c) 2021 Society of Chemical Industry (SCI).Article Citation - WoS: 6Citation - Scopus: 6Arsenic Removal From Aqueous Solutions by Ultrafiltration Assisted With Polyacrylamide: An Application of Response Surface Methodology(Taylor & Francis inc, 2015-10) Varol, Bekir; Uzal, NigmetThe present work deals with removal of arsenic from aqueous solutions by ultrafiltration assisted with polyacrylamide as an environmental friendly complexing polymer. The system performance was evaluated in relation to quality of permeate in terms of operating variables as feed concentration of arsenic ions (C-o, gL(-1)), ratio of polymer to arsenic (r, w/w), and pH of feed solution. The effect of the operating variables and maximum arsenic removal efficiency was determined by adopting design of experiments and response surface methodology under different conditions for this polymer. The experimental data were analyzed with a second order polynomial model validated by statistical analysis. Based on the response model developed, the maximum removal efficiency, close to 100%, of arsenic ions has been obtained at optimum operating parameters as C-o: 150 gL(-1), r: 2, and pH 10.