Browsing by Author "Sadeghi, Majid Mohammad"
Now showing 1 - 5 of 5
- Results Per Page
- Sort Options
bookpart.listelement.badge The Digitized Shoulder: From Preoperative Planning to Patient-Specific Guides(SPRINGER LINK, 2022) Sadeghi, Majid Mohammad; Kapicioglu, Mehmet; Kececi, Emin Faruk; Bilsel, Kerem; 0000-0001-8561-6960; AGÜ, Mühendislik Fakültesi, Makine Mühendisliği Bölümü; Kececi, Emin FarukAs the information and computer technologies improve, it can change how the shoulder surgeries and treatments are done. Digitalization of the shoulder joint acquired via MR and CT (1) shows the surgeons the pathology in a more easily understandable way, (2) generates models for preoperative planning, and (3) uses special software to generate patient-specific instruments. Digitalization of the shoulder will make the shoulder disorder’s treatment easier and more accurate in the future.conferenceobject.listelement.badge Finding Glenoid Surface on Scapula in 3D Medical Images for Shoulder Joint Implant Operation Planning-3D OCR(SPIE-INT SOC OPTICAL ENGINEERING1000 20TH ST, PO BOX 10, BELLINGHAM, WA 98227-0010 USA, 2017) Sadeghi, Majid Mohammad; Kececi, Emin Faruk; Bilsel, Kerem; Aralasmak, Ayse; AGÜ, Mühendislik Fakültesi, Makine Mühendisliği Bölümü; Kececi, Emin FarukMedical imaging has great importance in earlier detection, better treatment and follow-up of diseases. 3D Medical image analysis with CT Scan and MRI images has also been used to aid surgeries by enabling patient specific implant fabrication, where having a precise three dimensional model of associated body parts is essential. In this paper, a 3D image processing methodology for finding the plane on which the glenoid surface has a maximum surface area is proposed. Finding this surface is the first step in designing patient specific shoulder joint implant.conferenceobject.listelement.badge Hybrid Power System for Mobile Robotics(IEEE345 E 47TH ST, NEW YORK, NY 10017 USA, 2016) Sadeghi, Majid Mohammad; Kececi, Emin Faruk; AGÜ, Mühendislik Fakültesi, Makine Mühendisliği Bölümü; Kececi, Emin FarukThe power source is a design characteristic for a mobile robot in which the energy source used must provide enough power for a desired period of time depending on the specific task of a robot. Batteries are the most common power source of energy on mobile robots. Important factors for selecting battery solution as the power source includes weight of the batteries, maximum power availablility, maximum discharge rate, and the endurance of a battery. On the other hand, when the ratio of weight to energy is considered, overall, a gasoline engine is more efficient than a battery power system. This paper explains a design and realization of a hybrid energy system for a mobile robot where a gasoline engine powers an alternator to create electricity and this electrical energy is used to drive and power the electronics of the robot, with the understanding that it can only be used outside. The theory of a gasoline-electrical hybrid power system is explained and later by using a 5.5 horsepower (hp) Loncin engine and a car alternator a hybrid system is designed, manufactured and tested. The test results show the effectiveness of the design.conferenceobject.listelement.badge Off-the-Shelf Electronics in Rescue Robotics(ASSOC COMPUTING MACHINERY, 2015) Sadeghi, Majid Mohammad; Kececi, Emin Faruk; AGÜ, Mühendislik Fakültesi, Makine Mühendisliği Bölümü; Kececi, Emin FarukThe design and manufacturing methods of rescue robots with different locomotion principles are explained in the literature in detail. However, the design and realization of electronic circuits of a rescue robot still pose a great challenge, especially for the academics with mechanical background, who know how to design and build the mechanics of the robot but do not know how to make the robot work and make the right choices for the electronic parts, such as selecting a microcontroller or drivers. This research reports the methodology of building an electronic system for a mobile robot with off-the-shelf products.Article Three dimensional patient-specific guides for guide pin positioning in reverse shoulder arthroplasty: An experimental study on different glenoid types(SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD1 OLIVERS YARD, 55 CITY ROAD, LONDON EC1Y 1SP, ENGLAND, 2022) Kececi, Emin Faruk; Sadeghi, Majid Mohammad; Kapicioglu, Mehmet; Aralasmak, Ayse; Tezgel, Okan; Basaran, Murat Alper; Yildiz, Fatih; Bilsel, Kerem; 0000-0001-8654-855X; AGÜ, Mühendislik Fakültesi, Makine Mühendisliği Bölümü; Keçeci, Emin FarukIntroduction Incorrect positioning is one of the main factors for glenoid component loosening in reverse shoulder arthroplasty and component placement can be challenging. This study aimed to assess whether Patient-Specific Instrumentation (PSI) provides better guide pin positioning accuracy and is superior to standard guided and freehand instrumentation methods in cases of glenoid bone deformity. Materials and Methods Based on the Walch classification, five different scapula types were acquired by computed tomography (CT). For each type, two different surgeons placed a guide pin into the scapula using three different methods: freehand method, conventional non-patient-specific guide, and PSI guide. Each method was repeated five times by both surgeons. In these experiments, a total of 150 samples of scapula models were used (5 x 2 x 3 x 5 = 150). Post-operative CT scans of the samples with the guide pin were digitally assessed and the accuracy of the pin placement was determined by comparison to the preoperative planning on a three-dimensional (3D) model. Results The PSI method showed accuracies to the preoperative plan of 2.68 (SD 2.10) degrees for version angle (p < .05), 2.59 (SD 2.68) degrees for inclination angle (p < .05), and 1.55 (SD 1.26) mm for entry point offset (p < .05). The mean and standard deviation errors compared to planned values of version angle, inclination angle, and entry point offset were statistically significant for the PSI method for the type C defected glenoid and non-arthritic glenoid. Conclusion Using the PSI guide created by an image processing software tool for guide pin positioning showed advantages in glenoid component positioning over other methods, for defected and intact glenoid types, but correlation with clinical outcomes should be examined.