Browsing by Author "Ettelaie, Rammile"
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
- Results Per Page
- Sort Options
Article EVALUATION OF THE SENSORY CORRELATION BETWEEN TOUCH SENSITIVITY AND THE CAPACITY TO DISCRIMINATE VISCOSITY(WILEY, 2015) Aktar, Tugba; Chen, Jianshe; Ettelaie, Rammile; Holmes, Melvin; 0000-0001-8417-868X; AGÜ, Yaşam ve Doğa Bilimleri Fakültesi, Biyomühendislik BölümüThe capacity to discriminate the viscous nature of food materials is critically important in the sensory evaluation and subsequent perception of food texture and acceptability. It is generally assumed that this capability is closely linked to individual's tactile sensitivity, which in itself is a function of the individual's specific capabilities due to experience, age, lifestyle and health status for example. However, no experimental evidence is yet available to validate or disprove this assumption. By comparing the touch sensitivity and the capability of viscosity discrimination among individuals (using finger and tongue sensory perception), this work aims to establish if a correlation exists. Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments were used for touch sensitivity tests of the index fingers and tongue surfaces. A series of syrup solutions were prepared to give a wide range of viscosities with a viscosity scale factor of 1.20.009. A total of 30 healthy subjects (16 female and 14 male; mean age 29.9 +/- 9 years; mean body mass index 22.5 +/- 2.9kg/m(2)) participated in this study. A similar touch sensitivity threshold, 0.023 and 0.021g, was observed for the index fingertip and for the tongue, respectively. However, the tongue appears to be more sensitive to touch than the fingertips when the force range they cover was compared. The viscosity discrimination threshold was found to be approximately 53% for the index fingertip and around 47% for the tongue. By comparing individual capabilities of viscosity discrimination against touch sensitivity, no significant correlation was observed between the two factors. The results from this work suggest that the capability to discriminate viscosity differences is more likely attributed to experience and is little influenced by one's physiological capability of tactile sensation, e.g., the touch sensitivity. Practical ApplicationsThe capability to discriminate differences in viscosity and the subsequent perception is an important factor for food texture appreciation. Establishment of the underlying factors that characterize the variation in the ability for such discrimination across individuals is not only critically important for our fundamental understanding of the viscosity perception but is also hugely important for the food industry in development of new food products, and in particular for specific food design for individuals with special needs, e.g., elderly, dysphagia patients, etc. Differential threshold for certain tastes and aroma compounds has been investigated. However, little has been reported in the literature about the tactile interpretation of viscosity sensation and perception. Findings from this work could provide new insight for researchers in the food industry and in food development by giving them flexibility to redesign their ingredients especially the one that has thickening effect on the product viscosity. Methodologies used in this experiment could also be applied for general food sensory studies in establishing relationships between sensory psychology and sensory physiology and especially the threshold studies with a similar approach of finding just noticeable difference values of any stimuli. The method could also be applicable to sensory capability studies of some particular groups such as elderly people to assess how weakened physiology affects their sensory capability.Article TACTILE SENSITIVITY and CAPABILITY OF SOFT-SOLID TEXTURE DISCRIMINATION(WILEY, 2015) Aktar, Tugba; Ettelaie, Rammile; Chen, Jianshe; Holmes, Melvin; 0000-0001-8417-868X; AGÜ, Yaşam ve Doğa Bilimleri Fakültesi, Biyomühendislik Bölümü; Aktar, TugbaThe sensation and perception of food texture is regulated by tactile-dominated mechanisms and therefore, it is believed that one’s capability in discriminating food textural properties could be related to one’s tactile sensitivity. However, evidence to support this hypothesis is currently not available. This work aims to test this hypothesis by examining tactile sensitivity of individuals’ (touch detection threshold and two-point discrimination threshold) and texture discrimination capability. A range of soft-solid food samples with controlled firmness and elastic moduli were designed for textural discrimination tests. A total of 32 healthy subjects threshold of touch detection was found to be 0.028 g for the fingertip and 0.013 g for the tongue. Similarly, the mean threshold of two-point discrimination was 1.42 mm and 0.62 mm for the fingertip and tongue, respectively. Threshold for firmness discrimination (compressing until yielding) of the gel samples was 13.3% for the fingertip and 11.1% for the tongue. However, the elasticity discrimination threshold (by gentle pressing) of the population was found to be much smaller at 2.3% and 1.2% for the fingertip and the tongue respectively. Results show that tongue is slightly more sensitive than the fingertip in discriminating food texture (P < 0.05). An expected correlation between individual’s capability of texture discrimination and their tactile sensitivity was not observed.