Koken, EkinStrzalkowski, Pawel2025-10-202025-10-2020252363-62032363-6211https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-025-02634-2https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12573/5143The growing demand for dimensional stones in construction and monument conservation requires fast, repeatable and scientifically valid quality assessment procedures. The present study, in this context, established a solid foundation for quantifying the quality of dimension stones by adopting two quantitative methods: the Suitability Index (SI) and Dimension Stone Field Performance Coefficient (DSFPC). Both methods were coded in the MATLAB environment and implemented for 20 different rock types used in various dimension stone applications in Turkey. Evaluations based on the above-mentioned methods demonstrate that the DSFPC provides a more conservative assessment than the SI method. Additionally, engineering interpretations derived from the SI and DSFPC approaches are compared with recently published classification systems developed for the dimension stone industry. Focusing on this comparison, it is concluded that the adopted methods offer a more holistic evaluation framework compared to the approaches based solely on a single input parameter, such as effective porosity (ne), uniaxial compressive strength (UCS), or B & ouml;hme abrasion value (BAV) of rocks. Furthermore, it is concluded that the adopted methods complement each other by yielding supportive outcomes. The coded methods can be adapted to other lithological series and integrated with spatial information systems to support decision-making in mining and construction sectors. From this point of view, the present study may be considered a case study supporting holistic approaches to sustainable resource management in the dimension stone industry.eninfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessDimension StoneQuality AssessmentRock PropertiesEngineering InterpretationArticle10.1007/s40808-025-02634-22-s2.0-105017770349